You're 6 weeks from your SOC 2 audit. Securie's evidence is what your auditor wants.
Vulnerability management + secure SDLC + change management + continuous monitoring — 4 of 20 SOC 2 controls auto-evidenced by Securie's signed attestation chain.
This is for you if…
- Prepping for SOC 2 Type 1 (or moving from Type 1 to Type 2)
- Using Vanta / Drata / Secureframe
- Looking for ways to auto-evidence controls vs manually screenshot
The moments you feel this
You don't have a clean answer. You have screenshots from Snyk dashboard from last quarter.
You point at GitHub PR review screenshots. Auditor wants more.
Continuous evidence collection is the Type 2 cost. Manual evidence = headcount.
What Securie does for you
Auto-evidenced 4 of 20 SOC 2 controls
Vulnerability management (Securie scans every PR), secure SDLC (PR-review-with-Securie chain), change management (DSSE-signed attestations per merge), continuous monitoring (continuous-scan nightly + runtime correlation).
Auditor downloads the bundle directly
/api/auditor/bundle/<commit> serves DSSE-signed in-toto v1 envelopes. Auditor verifies with cosign.
What you don't need to know
- — DSSE envelope format
- — in-toto v1 schema
- — How cosign verify-blob works
What you actually do
- Install Securie
- Hand the auditor the bundle URL
- Continue collecting Vanta/Drata evidence for the other 16 controls
“Solo founders pass SOC 2 Type 1 in 6 weeks with Vanta + Securie + a boutique auditor.”
But wait…
Vanta already integrates with security scanners
Vanta's integrations capture status; Securie produces the actual scan output + DSSE-signed attestation. Complementary.
Auditor will accept screenshots from Snyk
Yes — but DSSE-signed attestations are stronger evidence + no manual collection. Securie removes the per-quarter evidence-screenshot ritual.
What about non-engineering controls?
Securie covers ~4 of 20 SOC 2 Security controls — the engineering ones. Vanta covers the rest (HR, vendor, policy).