You're evaluating Securie for your engineering org's security review. Here's the honest comparison.

Updated

200-engineer org, polyglot stack, dedicated AppSec team. Honest verdict: Securie's specialist depth on Next.js + Supabase + Vercel + AI features. Snyk / Veracode for legacy polyglot.

Start free — no cardHow it works for you

This is for you if…

  • Engineering leader at 100-500-engineer org
  • Polyglot stack (might include legacy Java / .NET / COBOL)
  • Have a dedicated AppSec or security team
  • Evaluating Securie alongside Snyk / Veracode / Checkmarx / GHAS

The moments you feel this

Snyk false-positive triage burden

Your security analysts spend 30% of time triaging FP. Engineers ignore findings due to fatigue.

AI-built features bug class uncovered

Snyk doesn't have a Supabase RLS specialist. Your AI features ship with structural gaps.

EU AI Act deadline approaching

Aug 2 2026 for high-risk Annex III. AIBOM emission + technical documentation needed.

What Securie does for you

Specialist depth on AI-built-app stack

20 detectors + RedTeam verifier + OffensiveSwarm targeting Supabase / Lovable / .claude/ / MCP patterns.

Sandbox-verified prove-don't-flag

Zero FP by construction. Engineers actually read findings.

EU AI Act AIBOM emission

CycloneDX 1.6 on every release alongside SBOM.

TEE / Customer-VPC / on-prem-air-gapped tiers

Same deployment options as legacy SAST + operator-zero-knowledge tier.

What you don't need to know

  • — What Firecracker microVM is
  • — How DSSE envelopes work
  • — What CycloneDX 1.6 modelCard schema looks like

What you actually do

  1. Run Securie + Snyk parallel on a representative repo for 4 weeks
  2. Compare specialist coverage + FP rate + engineering velocity
  3. Cut Snyk for AI-built-app surface; keep for legacy polyglot if applicable

“Enterprise teams with dedicated AppSec run Securie alongside Snyk for complementary coverage.”

But wait…

We have an existing Snyk contract

Most reasonable migration: keep Snyk for polyglot legacy + add Securie for AI-built-app surface. Securie's pricing tier supports per-tenant; doesn't require all-or-nothing.

Per-tenant pricing scaling concerns

Securie Startup tier: 50 repos / $299/mo. For 200-engineer orgs, custom enterprise pricing.

What about polyglot Java / .NET / COBOL?

Java + .NET ship in the post-launch fleet (CLAUDE.md 'Ships alongside the MVP'). For COBOL specifically, Veracode is still the right tool.