Securie vs Endor Labs
Endor is best-in-class SCA reachability. Securie covers the first-party-code AppSec layer Endor doesn't.
Endor SCA + Securie AppSec is the canonical pairing.
Endor for SCA reachability. Securie for first-party AppSec. Run both.
Feature comparison
| Securie | Endor Labs | |
|---|---|---|
| SCA reachability | OSV + intent-graph reachability | Best-in-class |
| First-party code scan | Yes — specialist fleet | Limited |
| Supabase RLS | Yes | No |
| AI-built-app specialist depth | Yes | No |
Where the difference shows up in practice
Vulnerable dependency reachable
Endor Labs: Endor catches with reachability proof.
Securie: OSV + intent-graph reachability — less deep.
BOLA on first-party route
Endor Labs: Outside SCA scope.
Securie: AuthAuthz specialist.
The deeper tradeoff
Endor's SCA reachability is best-in-class for dependency-side risk. The gap is everything not in dependencies — first-party auth, BOLA, RLS, AI-features. Different layers.
Pricing
$12-$299/mo
Enterprise
Migration playbook
Step 1: Run both
What: Endor for SCA + Securie for AppSec.
Why: Different layers.
Gotchas: Both checks for branch protection.
When to pick Endor Labs
SCA reachability + SBOM at scale.
When to pick Securie
First-party + AI-built-app coverage.
Bottom line
Different categories. Most teams run both.
FAQ
Run both?
Yes — canonical pairing.