Introducing Securie — the AI codebase maintenance engineer for business-critical software
Request access to Securie, the AI codebase maintenance engineer for business-critical software. Public OSS starts free, private repos start at $39/month with Starter, and tested repairs, evidence, and Business+ on-demand replay scale from there.
Most application security tools were designed in a world where a careful engineer reviewed every line before it shipped.
That is not the world your team ships in anymore.
Your co-founder uses Cursor. Your designer uses Lovable. Your intern uses Bolt. Most of the code in your repository was not typed by a human — it was generated by a model, pasted into a pull request, and merged with a "looks good to me" when the dev server showed something that felt right.
The application-security industry did not update for this. Snyk, GitHub Advanced Security, and Semgrep still run the same playbook: pattern-match the code, produce a list of possibly-suspicious lines, hand that list to a human to triage. Their average false-positive rates sit near 70 percent. When every commit is AI-generated, that 70 percent becomes an unlivable tax.
What Securie is
Securie is an AI codebase maintenance engineer. It checks every pull request and release path, identifies real maintenance and security risk, drafts the repair, verifies it against your tests, and hands you reviewable work in the same pull-request thread you were already reading.
Three principles run the product:
- Prove, do not flag. A finding that cannot be reproduced as a working exploit is dropped. You only ever see real bugs.
- Patch, do not ticket. The default output is a pull-request comment with the fix, not a dashboard row to triage.
- Attest, do not report. Every scan emits a signed, auditor-consumable receipt of what ran, what was found, and what was fixed.
Launch scope
We are shipping one vertical slice well rather than spreading thin:
- Language: TypeScript and JavaScript
- Framework: Next.js
- Data layer: Supabase
- Host: Vercel
- Specialist checks: Supabase Row-Level-Security misconfiguration, committed secrets, broken access control (BOLA, BFLA, IDOR)
If that is your stack today, Securie will find bugs in your repo within ten minutes of install.
Public OSS starts free
Public OSS repos can start on the capped free review path with a public badge and review page. Private repos use managed Securie plans for private evidence, deeper proof runs, tested repair proposals, deploy gates, and support.
Request access at securie.ai/signup.
Related posts
From a growing sample of publicly-reachable Supabase projects we've audited, the same seven mistakes come up every time: RLS off on at least one table, service-role key in the client, missing tenant scoping, default-allow policies, no policies on storage buckets, exposed JWT secret, and over-broad anon-role grants. Fixes for each.
We ran 500 authentication-related prompts against Claude Opus 4.7, GPT-5.4, Gemini 2.5, and DeepSeek V3.2. 92% of the generated code had at least one security bug. Here is the catalog of the top seven recurring mistakes.
Moltbook leaked 1.5 million API keys, 35,000 emails, and 4,060 private messages in 72 hours. Wiz's disclosure showed the root cause: a single Supabase table without row-level security. Here is the timeline, the exact bug, and the ten-minute hardening walkthrough for your own app.
The Next.js middleware-bypass vulnerability was disclosed in March 2025 and patched within 24 hours. One year later, forty percent of public Next.js apps are still running vulnerable versions. Here is why, and the two-minute check to run on yours.